By Sahotra Sarkar, Anya Plutynski
Made from essays by way of most sensible students within the box, this quantity bargains particular overviews of philosophical concerns raised via biology.
• Brings jointly a crew of eminent students to discover the philosophical matters raised through biology• Addresses conventional and rising subject matters, spanning molecular biology and genetics, evolution, developmental biology, immunology, ecology, brain and behavior, neuroscience, and experimentation• starts with a radical creation to the field• is going past prior remedies that centred in simple terms on evolution to provide equivalent cognizance to different components, corresponding to molecular and developmental biology• Represents either an authoritative advisor to philosophy of biology, and an available reference paintings for a person looking to find out about this rapidly-changing box
Read Online or Download A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy) PDF
Similar philosophy books
Are looking to be crafty? it's possible you'll want you have been extra shrewdpermanent, extra versatile, in a position to minimize a number of corners with no getting stuck, to dive from time to time into iniquity and floor clutching a prize. you need to roll your eyes at these slaves of accountability who play by way of the principles. otherwise you may possibly imagine there's whatever sleazy approximately that stance, whether it does appear to repay.
Environmental tradition and the problem of reason
Culture as opposed to techno-optimism: cause to the rescue?
Adding ecology: ecohumanities perspectives
1 The ecological concern of reason
The penguin’s story
Modern heirs of rationalism
Dualism and fiscal rationalism
Blindspots of rationalism: the fisheries case
A gendered schedule: neither rational, ecological or ethical
2 Rationalism and the paradox of science
The double face of science
Disengagement as sado-dispassionate practice
The subject/object divide and the anomaly of science
Resolving the anomaly of technology: integrating the ‘two cultures’
Anthropocentrism and anthropomorphism
3 The politics of ecological rationality
The rationality of the EcoRepublic
The politics of rationality
Remoteness and decision
Remoteness, autarchy and spatial scale
4 Inequality and ecological rationality
Liberal democracy and ecological rationality
Beyond liberal democracy: deliberative modifications
Beyond deliberative democracy
The ecological rationality of procedural and participatory democracy
5 The blindspots of centrism and human self-enclosure
Rationalism and human-centredness
The logical constitution of centrism
A parallel liberation version of anthropocentrism
Economic centrism: nature as category and resource
The centric parallel as a realistic model
Otherising as an obstacle to justice
The prudential blindspots of anthropocentrism
6 Philosophy, prudence and anthropocentrism
Is hard anthropocentrism beside the point and unhelpful?
Is human-centredness inevitable? The difficulty of prudential argument
Is human-centredness inevitable? The argument from standpoint
Selfishness and cosmic irrelevance
Recognition, prudence and survival
7 The ethics of commodification
Commodification and person/property dualism
Minimalist methodologies of closure
Animal rights and vegetarian duties
Rationalism, manufacturing unit farming and use/respect dualism
8 in the direction of a dialogical interspecies ethics
Decentring human-centred ethics
Ranking, dualism and heterogeneity
Ranking and interspecies egalitarianism
Framework stances and the parable of mindlessness
Intentionality and ethical value
The intentional reputation stance and non-humans
Opening up interspecies ethics
Communicative interspecies ethics
9 cohesion, unity and deep ecology
The foundation of harmony: id or difference?
Solidarity and oppressive techniques of unity
Unity and the political idea of deep ecology
The ecological enlightenment of the guy of property
Is there an eco-socialist deep ecology?
10 in the direction of a materialist spirituality of place
Is spirituality extra fundamental?
‘Materialism’ and spirit/matter dualism
Trickster spirituality: the area as agent
Place-based spirituality as oppositional practice
- Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Hume on Morality
- Pessimism: Philosophy, Ethic, Spirit
- L'évènement Socrate
- The Philosophy of John Dewey: A Critical Exposition of His Method, Metaphysics, and Theory of Knowledge
- A Workbook for Arguments: A Complete Course in Critical Thinking
Additional info for A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy)
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Müller-Wille, S. & Orel, V. (2007). From Linnaean species to Mendelian factors: elements of hybridism, 1751–1870. Annals of Science, 64, 171–215. Olby, R. C. (1979). Mendel no Mendelian? History of Science, 17, 53–72. Olby, R. C. (1985). Origins of Mendelism (2nd edn). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Portin, P. (1993). The concept of the gene: short history and present status. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 68, 173–223. Provine, W. B. (1971). Origins of theoretical population genetics.
The concept of information in biology. Philosophy of Science, 67, 177–94. , & Provine, W. (Eds). (1980). The evolutionary synthesis: perspectives on the unification of biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Mendel, G. (1866). Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden. Verhand lungen des Naturforschenden Vereins Brünn, 4 (1865), 3–47. English translation: Mendel, G. (1965). Experiments in plant hybridization. Ed. by James Bennet. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd. Morange, M. (1998). La part des gènes.
Johannsen himself stressed that the genotype had to be treated as independent of any life history and thus as an “ahistoric” entity amenable to scientific scrutiny like the objects of physics and chemistry (Johannsen, 1911; see Churchill, 1974; Roll-Hansen, 1978a). Unlike most Mendelians, however, he remained convinced that the genotype would possess an overall architecture. He therefore had reservations with respect to its particulate character, and especially warned that the notion of “genes for a particular character” should always be used cautiously if not altogether be omitted (cf.