Download Between Philosophy and Religion: Spinoza, the Bible, and by Brayton Polka PDF

By Brayton Polka

.cs95E872D0{text-align:left;text-indent:0pt;margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt} .cs5EFED22F{color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-family:Times New Roman; font-size:12pt; font-weight:normal; font-style:normal; } .csA62DFD6A{color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-family:Times New Roman; font-size:12pt; font-weight:normal; font-style:italic; } In among Philosophy and faith Volumes I and II, Brayton Polka examines Spinoza's 3 significant works--on faith, politics, and ethics--in order to teach that his proposal is without delay biblical and smooth. Polka argues that Spinoza is biblical simply insofar as he's understood to be one of many nice philosophers of modernity and that he's sleek simply while it's understood that he's targeted in making the translation of the Bible imperative to philosophy and philosophy vital to the translation of the Bible. This booklet and its significant other quantity are crucial analyzing for any student of Spinoza.

Show description

Read Online or Download Between Philosophy and Religion: Spinoza, the Bible, and Modernity: Vol. I: Hermeneutics and Ontology PDF

Similar philosophy books


Are looking to be crafty? you could want you have been extra smart, extra versatile, capable of minimize a couple of corners with out getting stuck, to dive occasionally into iniquity and floor clutching a prize. you should roll your eyes at these slaves of responsibility who play by means of the foundations. otherwise you could imagine there's anything sleazy approximately that stance, whether it does appear to repay.

Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason

Environmental tradition and the hindrance of reason
Culture as opposed to techno-optimism: cause to the rescue?
Adding ecology: ecohumanities perspectives

1 The ecological situation of reason
The penguin’s story
Modern heirs of rationalism
Dualism and financial rationalism
Blindspots of rationalism: the fisheries case
A gendered time table: neither rational, ecological or ethical

2 Rationalism and the anomaly of science
The double face of science
Disengagement as sado-dispassionate practice
The subject/object divide and the anomaly of science
Resolving the anomaly of technology: integrating the ‘two cultures’
Anthropocentrism and anthropomorphism

3 The politics of ecological rationality
The rationality of the EcoRepublic
The politics of rationality
Remoteness and decision
Remoteness, autarchy and spatial scale

4 Inequality and ecological rationality
Liberal democracy and ecological rationality
Beyond liberal democracy: deliberative modifications
Beyond deliberative democracy
The ecological rationality of procedural and participatory democracy

5 The blindspots of centrism and human self-enclosure
Rationalism and human-centredness
The logical constitution of centrism
A parallel liberation version of anthropocentrism
Economic centrism: nature as category and resource
The centric parallel as a pragmatic model
Otherising as an obstacle to justice
The prudential blindspots of anthropocentrism

6 Philosophy, prudence and anthropocentrism
Is hard anthropocentrism beside the point and unhelpful?
Is human-centredness inevitable? The quandary of prudential argument
Is human-centredness inevitable? The argument from standpoint
Selfishness and cosmic irrelevance
Recognition, prudence and survival

7 The ethics of commodification
Commodification and person/property dualism
Minimalist methodologies of closure
Animal rights and vegetarian duties
Rationalism, manufacturing unit farming and use/respect dualism

8 in the direction of a dialogical interspecies ethics
Decentring human-centred ethics
Ranking, dualism and heterogeneity
Ranking and interspecies egalitarianism
Framework stances and the parable of mindlessness
Intentionality and ethical value
The intentional attractiveness stance and non-humans
Opening up interspecies ethics
Communicative interspecies ethics

9 solidarity, team spirit and deep ecology
The foundation of cohesion: id or difference?
Solidarity and oppressive thoughts of unity
Unity and the political thought of deep ecology
The ecological enlightenment of the guy of property
Is there an eco-socialist deep ecology?

10 in the direction of a materialist spirituality of place
Is spirituality extra fundamental?
‘Materialism’ and spirit/matter dualism
Human-centred spiritualities
Indigenous critiques
Trickster spirituality: the realm as agent
Place-based spirituality as oppositional practice

11 end

Extra info for Between Philosophy and Religion: Spinoza, the Bible, and Modernity: Vol. I: Hermeneutics and Ontology

Sample text

This is not a true (or adequate) distinction between divine and human. Rather, it is a distinction between what is adequately divine (and human) and what is inadequately human (and divine). We have already seen Spinoza indicate that knowledge and love of God as the supreme good of human beings are their ratio vivendi. But this ratio vivendi, as the divine law, comprehends both politics and ethics. The ultimate distinction here is not that between speculation (mind) and carnal man (politics). 2.

Wherefore, it is far from the case that the faith of histories has the requisite necessity whereby we can arrive at our supreme good” (52). 3. , that surpass human understanding), and that, therefore, cannot perfect our intellect. ” 4. “Its reward is the law itself, namely, to know God and to love him from true freedom and from whole and constant mind” (53). Its penalty is simply the privation of these things, that is, enslavement to the flesh or to an inconstant mind. Having outlined the basic content of the “divine natural law”—it is universal; it does not rest on history; it does not involve ceremonies; its reward is the law itself: to love and to know God freely and wholly—Spinoza now poses four questions about Scripture in light of his concept of the divine natural law.

4–5. 5. See Hos. 7. 6. I omit here that part of God’s curse on Eve that Adam her husband “shall rule over you” (Gen. 16). Even if this passage can be saved, I view it, in the spirit of Spinoza, as accommodation (on the part of both author and audience) to the sociological reality (hierarchical gender relations) of the age. 7. I have not attempted to preserve the prosody of the passages that I cite from Hosea. 8. I have transposed these two lines from Matthew. 3. 9. Already St. Augustine had clearly seen in the City of God that the fact that we are deceived (or that we are sinners) supports, not the academic skeptics (in the tradition of Plato) but the faithful.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.72 of 5 – based on 39 votes