By Robert D'Amico
Modern Continental Philosophy steps again from present debates evaluating Continental and analytic philosophy and thoroughly, but severely outlines the tradition’s major philosophical perspectives on epistemology and ontology.
Forgoing vague paraphrases, D’Amico presents an in depth, transparent account and overview of the culture from its founding via Husserl and Heidegger to its problem through Derrida and Foucault. notwithstanding meant as a survey of this practice through the 20th century, this study’s concentration is at the philosophical difficulties which gave it start or even now proceed to form it.The booklet reexamines Husserl as an early critic of epistemological naturalism whose clutch of the philosophical significance of the speculation of which means was once principally missed.
Heidegger’s contrasting attempt to restore ontology is tested when it comes to his contrast among ontic and ontological questions. by contrast with many past experiences, the writer outlines confusions engendered by way of the misappropriation of the detailed philosophical agendas of Husserl and Heidegger via such recognized figures as Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. The publication can also be unique in its emphasis on how social externalism in epistemology, encouraged by way of Karl Mannheim, inspired this tradition’s structuralist and Marxist stages. The philosophical defenses of a thought of interpretation through Gadamer and Habermas are heavily tested and assessed and the research concludes with a a probing but balanced account of Foucault and Derrida as critics of philosophical autonomy. The ebook concludes via reassessing this century-long divide among the analytic and Continental traditions and its implication for the way forward for philosophy.
Read or Download Contemporary Continental Philosophy (Dimensions of Philosophy) PDF
Best philosophy books
Are looking to be crafty? chances are you'll want you have been extra shrewdpermanent, extra versatile, capable of minimize a number of corners with out getting stuck, to dive sometimes into iniquity and floor clutching a prize. you'll want to roll your eyes at these slaves of responsibility who play by way of the principles. otherwise you may imagine there's whatever sleazy approximately that stance, no matter if it does appear to repay.
Environmental tradition and the main issue of reason
Culture as opposed to techno-optimism: cause to the rescue?
Adding ecology: ecohumanities perspectives
1 The ecological difficulty of reason
The penguin’s story
Modern heirs of rationalism
Dualism and monetary rationalism
Blindspots of rationalism: the fisheries case
A gendered schedule: neither rational, ecological or ethical
2 Rationalism and the paradox of science
The double face of science
Disengagement as sado-dispassionate practice
The subject/object divide and the anomaly of science
Resolving the anomaly of technological know-how: integrating the ‘two cultures’
Anthropocentrism and anthropomorphism
3 The politics of ecological rationality
The rationality of the EcoRepublic
The politics of rationality
Remoteness and decision
Remoteness, autarchy and spatial scale
4 Inequality and ecological rationality
Liberal democracy and ecological rationality
Beyond liberal democracy: deliberative modifications
Beyond deliberative democracy
The ecological rationality of procedural and participatory democracy
5 The blindspots of centrism and human self-enclosure
Rationalism and human-centredness
The logical constitution of centrism
A parallel liberation version of anthropocentrism
Economic centrism: nature as classification and resource
The centric parallel as a realistic model
Otherising as an obstacle to justice
The prudential blindspots of anthropocentrism
6 Philosophy, prudence and anthropocentrism
Is demanding anthropocentrism inappropriate and unhelpful?
Is human-centredness inevitable? The trouble of prudential argument
Is human-centredness inevitable? The argument from standpoint
Selfishness and cosmic irrelevance
Recognition, prudence and survival
7 The ethics of commodification
Commodification and person/property dualism
Minimalist methodologies of closure
Animal rights and vegetarian duties
Rationalism, manufacturing unit farming and use/respect dualism
8 in the direction of a dialogical interspecies ethics
Decentring human-centred ethics
Ranking, dualism and heterogeneity
Ranking and interspecies egalitarianism
Framework stances and the parable of mindlessness
Intentionality and ethical value
The intentional reputation stance and non-humans
Opening up interspecies ethics
Communicative interspecies ethics
9 solidarity, harmony and deep ecology
The foundation of cohesion: id or difference?
Solidarity and oppressive suggestions of unity
Unity and the political conception of deep ecology
The ecological enlightenment of the fellow of property
Is there an eco-socialist deep ecology?
10 in the direction of a materialist spirituality of place
Is spirituality extra fundamental?
‘Materialism’ and spirit/matter dualism
Trickster spirituality: the realm as agent
Place-based spirituality as oppositional practice
- Paradoxes from A to Z (2nd Edition)
- A Companion To Schopenhauer (Blackwell Companions To Philosophy)
- Turkish Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science)
- Sartre and Adorno: The Dialectics of Subjectivity
- The Age of Louis XIV (The Story of Civilization, Volume 8)
- On Aristotle On the Soul 3.1-5 (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle)
Extra info for Contemporary Continental Philosophy (Dimensions of Philosophy)
CM 89-90)23 The critic's objection arose in the first place because the critic noted that, within the reduction, the "interiority" of other egos cannot appear to the reflective ego. The reflective ego directs itself to the world as phenomenally presented, but then it is necessarily the case that other egos appear only as other objects. That insight correctly repeats HusserPs radical internalism; access to the immediacy of only one's own mental contents is the indubitable foundation of his method.
When Immanuel Kant called himself a transcendental idealist, he set out a controversial type of compromise with the threat of skepticism. Kant protected empirical realism, needed for the defense of scientific objectivity, by taking the view that there was a domain of features about the world that are mind-dependent; hence his stance toward this domain was idealist. , the reality of the world as it appears to the senses) by securing access to what Kant called "things-in-themselves" as parallel to or providing the foundation for access to the empirical world.
If I simply think of the world existing apart from me and thus imagine myself as the only ego experiencing the world (if I imagine, for example, that a terrible plague leaves me the world's only human survivor), 1 have not carried through the phenomenological reduction. My thought experiment remains wholly naturalistic, in Husserl's sense of that term. I am continuing to assume the naturalistic sense of an external world while modifying the possible matters of fact within it. The reduction is not concerned with actual or possible scenarios about the world's matters of fact.