Download Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, by Lynda Lange (auth.), Sandra Harding, Merrill B. Hintikka PDF

By Lynda Lange (auth.), Sandra Harding, Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.)

During the decade, feminist study has tried so as to add understandings of girls and their social actions to what all of us inspiration we knew approximately nature and social existence. even if, from the very starting of this undertaking, it has in rigidity with a few ofthe such a lot basic insightsof the second one Women's flow. only in the near past has the character ofthis stress turn into transparent. in the theories, recommendations, equipment and targets of inquiry we inherited from the dominant discourses now we have generated a powerful selection of "facts" approximately girls and their lives, cross-culturally and traditionally - and we will be able to produce many, many extra. yet those don't, and can't, upload as much as greater than a partial and distorted figuring out of the styles of women's lives. we can't comprehend ladies and their lives through including evidence approximately them to our bodies of information which take males, their lives, and their ideals because the human norm. in addition, it's now obtrusive that if women's livescannot be understood in the inherited inquiry frameworks, than neither can men's lives. The makes an attempt so as to add understandings of ladies to our wisdom of nature and social lifestyles have ended in the conclusion that there's invaluable little trustworthy wisdom to which so as to add them. A extra primary undertaking now confronts us. Wemust root out sexist distortions and perversions in epistemology, metaphysics, method and the philos­ ophy of technology - within the "hard middle" of summary reasoning notion such a lot proof against inftltration by way of social values.

Show description

Read or Download Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science PDF

Similar philosophy books

Cunning

Are looking to be crafty? chances are you'll want you have been extra shrewdpermanent, extra versatile, in a position to lower a number of corners with out getting stuck, to dive on occasion into iniquity and floor clutching a prize. you have to roll your eyes at these slaves of accountability who play through the foundations. otherwise you may perhaps imagine there's anything sleazy approximately that stance, whether it does appear to repay.

Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason

Introduction
Environmental tradition and the predicament of reason
Culture as opposed to techno-optimism: cause to the rescue?
Adding ecology: ecohumanities perspectives

1 The ecological concern of reason
The penguin’s story
Modern heirs of rationalism
Dualism and monetary rationalism
Blindspots of rationalism: the fisheries case
A gendered schedule: neither rational, ecological or ethical

2 Rationalism and the paradox of science
The double face of science
Disengagement as sado-dispassionate practice
The subject/object divide and the paradox of science
Resolving the anomaly of technology: integrating the ‘two cultures’
Anthropocentrism and anthropomorphism

3 The politics of ecological rationality
The rationality of the EcoRepublic
The politics of rationality
Remoteness and decision
Remoteness, autarchy and spatial scale

4 Inequality and ecological rationality
Liberal democracy and ecological rationality
Beyond liberal democracy: deliberative modifications
Beyond deliberative democracy
The ecological rationality of procedural and participatory democracy

5 The blindspots of centrism and human self-enclosure
Rationalism and human-centredness
The logical constitution of centrism
A parallel liberation version of anthropocentrism
Economic centrism: nature as type and resource
The centric parallel as a pragmatic model
Otherising as an obstacle to justice
The prudential blindspots of anthropocentrism

6 Philosophy, prudence and anthropocentrism
Is not easy anthropocentrism beside the point and unhelpful?
Is human-centredness inevitable? The trouble of prudential argument
Is human-centredness inevitable? The argument from standpoint
Selfishness and cosmic irrelevance
Recognition, prudence and survival

7 The ethics of commodification
Commodification and person/property dualism
Minimalist methodologies of closure
Animal rights and vegetarian duties
Rationalism, manufacturing unit farming and use/respect dualism

8 in the direction of a dialogical interspecies ethics
Decentring human-centred ethics
Ranking, dualism and heterogeneity
Ranking and interspecies egalitarianism
Framework stances and the parable of mindlessness
Intentionality and ethical value
The intentional attractiveness stance and non-humans
Opening up interspecies ethics
Communicative interspecies ethics

9 team spirit, cohesion and deep ecology
The foundation of cohesion: identification or difference?
Solidarity and oppressive strategies of unity
Unity and the political conception of deep ecology
The ecological enlightenment of the fellow of property
Is there an eco-socialist deep ecology?

10 in the direction of a materialist spirituality of place
Is spirituality extra fundamental?
‘Materialism’ and spirit/matter dualism
Human-centred spiritualities
Indigenous critiques
Trickster spirituality: the realm as agent
Place-based spirituality as oppositional practice

11 end

Additional resources for Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science

Sample text

These tortured ideas are the basis of the notion that Aristotle is not really a sexist, and that he meant only that "the female" (in the neuter, of course) was not a bearer of the highest form of rationality, and not necessarily that actual females (in the female) were such. Whatever this may mean, it's supposed to be a good thing for women . But if this were the case, why does Aristotle go ahead and conclude that women are in fact inferior, and ought to have an inferior position in society ? Perhap s it is only "the female" or "the female principle" he meant to exclude from political life.

Scientists necessarily bring distorting metaphysical commitments from their class and sex-dominating roles in social life, and these are reinforced in the social arrangements within science. Since the social arrangements of the scientific enterprise as well as of the larger society are considered outside the legitimate domain of scientific criticism, these metaphysical commitments systematically escape critical scientific examination, and thus pass through the scienific process to distort our understandings of nature and ourselves.

Given this scheme, it would be an act of positive virtue for a man to attempt to dominate a woman and compel her to be obedient to him. Conversely, a man who treated a woman as an equal would be acting in a shameful manner. The best support for the relevance of the biology to the ethics and politics comes from Aristotle himself. In the Eudemian Ethics he writes: . . we should not think even in political philosophy that the sort of consideration which not only makes the nature of the thing evident but also its cause is superfluous, for such consideration is in every enquiry the truly philosophic method.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.05 of 5 – based on 35 votes